|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
1
|
Posted - 2015.05.03 22:03:35 -
[1] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:This "delusion" is a product of first hand experience of everyone below SP wall being useless against everyone above it. The exceptions are either self-destructions or double miracle class occurences, which leads us to the fact that the general rule is solid with presented exceptions. At least you admit it's a delusion. That's progress.
But how many SP is the skillpoint wall today? It seems so variable. Sometimes you say it's 120 million, other times 80 million, other time 50 million; and always that characters below that level are useless. How someone can simultaneously be useful at 60 million (above the skillpoint wall one day) and useless (below it another day) is illogical.
Unfortunately for all your spin about the current skillpoint system being bad, you won't ever get the support behind you to change it because you are so negative and unbalanced about everything, to the point where people just don't seriously listen to anything you have to say. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
5
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 10:43:12 -
[2] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:The rest got properly ignored to divert attention from the real issue of utter lack of anything other than "cuz I'm leet"-class sentences. Your whole argument has always boiled down to because you say so.
It's no different to what you claim of other people and you never offer any evidence to support your claims.
To counter that, I'll just throw out there, that there is no SP wall because I say so.
Just as valid and much more realistic. As with your argument, no counter statements will prove anything other than the correctness of my view and all evidence will be construed to support my view also.
CCP, make skill training harder. It's way too easy at the moment and vets should gain some advantage from the time they put in. At the moment, any new player can come in and beat them. It's not fair. there needs to be a skillpoint wall. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
7
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 11:20:48 -
[3] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:hot air Lot's of guff without any proof and resorting to ad hominem attacks that you compain about from others.
Yep, thanks. If you can't provide evidence to support your statements, you are only proving my point.
Thanks Basil for supporting the view that there should be a skillpoint wall. I hope CCP take note of this and make the gap larger. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
7
|
Posted - 2015.05.04 11:31:47 -
[4] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:At least I always quoted the whole post, snipping only obvious insults - just to ease the workload of ISD who's going to have to remove them from quotes anyway. Never picking at words, never snipping mid-line, always addressing the whole point brought in. Oh ok then:
Basil Pupkin wrote:It appears to me that I'm failing if up to this post the most thick-headed people could still miss the arguments I bring every time.
Still can't offer anything other than to address the poster. Once again, thanks for the support of my view since you can't counter it with any evidence.
You are really building us case for CCP here. More benefit to vets needed. New players are too good at pvp too early.
Surely you can do better then that, with actual evidence to refute my view. Of course, it's impossible to do, since there is no skillpoint wall as you now support yourself. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
10
|
Posted - 2015.05.05 01:05:19 -
[5] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:Akirei Scytale wrote:Oh, and Basil, you're very wrong. Your proof of that being "cuz I said so", amirite? Oh yes, absolutely.
It's the same approach you use, but our right is correct.
Every post you make further proves it because you are unable to provide any direct proof of what you claim. Thank you for your continued demonstration of how right I and those of us that think the same, are. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
11
|
Posted - 2015.05.05 01:17:17 -
[6] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote: There has been a load of direct proof provided and you weren't even brave enough to quote it, preferring to call it names. Well, those are internetz. All your carefully selected proof will be ignored. To be showered with proof and claim none was received, while being afraid to even quote the material 1/10.
Oh no, I am not afraid. In fact, I would welcome direct proof. There is no better way to prove my own point than to spin any proof you provide into supporting my view.
I've learnt that from one so competent at it. You.
Unfortunately, there is nothing to quote as no direct proof has been offered.
But more than happy to spin any that you can actually provide.
However, I must once again congratulate you for supporting my view. Each post without proof just further proves you have no evidence, thus my view is more correct.
I sincerely hope CCP finally take note and increase the gap between new and old players. It just isn't large enough at the moment. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
11
|
Posted - 2015.05.05 04:46:31 -
[7] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:Imagine you spent 10 years building up a region like Providence and no Brave can approach it now. Booooooooooooooring. No thanks. Confirming once again that new players can make a huge difference, not only in pvp, but in sov null pvp too.
Grrr new players.
Thanks Basil. |

Amy Undergood
Life Associates
13
|
Posted - 2015.05.09 04:37:56 -
[8] - Quote
Basil Pupkin[i wrote:]Lot's of passionate stuff....surely with lots of undeniable evidence[/i]
What joys are you gifting me today Basil?
Let's see:
Paragraph 1: Nope. No evidence to support your claim there.
Paragraph 2: Nope, None there either
Paragraph 3: Nope, no evidence but an admission of ignorance. Good progress.
Paragraph 4: Nope. You are called wrong because you provide no evidence, just statements. Good example of that.
Paragraph 5: Nope, but I definitely urge you to seek a limit to stupidity. At the moment, it seems quite rampant. No evidence though
Paragraph 6: Nope, no evidence. That would be much better than stating you will repeat your claim
Paragraph 7 and associated points 1-3: Nope. I had high hopes for this bit, but again nothing more than just empty claims. One day maybe, there'll be something included to verify what you claim
Paragraph 8: Unfortunately no again. It starts so well with a claim hard undeniable truth, yet lacking in any evidence to support that claim. If it is so undeniable, where is the evidence to support it?
Paragraph 9: Nope yet again. No evidence to support anything you claim.
Paragraph 10 (final paragraph): I can only also cry (with laughter) at how well your empty claims add weight (by exclusion) to the opposite view.
CCP, please listen to the argument that Basil makes by not giving us any evidence of his claims. We need more benefit to being a veteran. It is too easy for new players to beat them in pvp. |
|
|
|